Friday, September 30, 2011
And here is the answer from Dave
Mr. John-in-Reno,
I did arrive late an didn't hear your
comments. I dis just bring up your issue however. I was told that we
would have a legal briefing as to our current legal standing at our
October or November meeting.
-Dave
Sent from my portable telephonic doo-hickey device.
Sent from my portable telephonic doo-hickey device.
Labels:
RTC
|
0
comments
RTC Board Meeting Sept 30, 2011
I went to the RTC board meeting today and Renoglock22 was also there, we where both open carrying.
When the time came I went up the the front and spoke to the council and I was nervous about it due to the fact I hate public speaking and here is what I said:
Dave Aiazzi was not in attendance so I sent him an email with the above mentioned comments.
So lets see what happens now
When the time came I went up the the front and spoke to the council and I was nervous about it due to the fact I hate public speaking and here is what I said:
As I was reading this I did notice one of the commissioners writing something down and was also giving me looks like how dare you bring this up!Good morning to the Regional transportation commissionersMy name is John Blair, I have been for the past year writing letters to the Reno and Sparks city councils and also to the Washoe county commissioners having to do with gun laws.I am here in front of the Region Transportation commission, to let you know that in 1989 the legislators in the state of Nevada repealed all the gun laws and amended it in 2007 to make it clear as to the meaning.NRS244.364 subsection 1 statesExcept as otherwise provided by specific statute, (which there are none in NRS277A which is what you operate under) the Legislature reserves for itself such rights and powers as are necessary to regulate the transfer, sale, purchase, possession, ownership, transportation, registration and licensing of firearms and ammunition in Nevada, and no county may infringe upon those rights and powersNow in saying that you have a rule stating that “Guns are strictly forbidden unless carried by on-duty law enforcement, (the) 4TH STREET STATION and (the) CENTENNIAL PLAZA security officers, or an individual with a valid concealed weapons permit”, and it is not in compliance with State law and needs to be deleted from the rules and inform both your drivers and security as to the rule change.I was talking to one of the RTC commissioners on Monday of this week, and he informed me that NRS 244.364 is for counties 400,000 people and over and does not apply to Washoe county because we do not have that many people living here.I checked the census and found that Washoe County has 421,000, then he informed me there was a bill that modified that to 700,000 which I did find.The thing that this commissioner did not understand and neither did I, until I researched further is that the population only applies to subsection 3 in NRS244.364 which has to do with Registration of a firearm and DOES NOT apply to subsection #1 which I read to you earlier.I am asking the commission to delete the rule I mentioned earlier about the gun/firearm, as to avoid any kind of problems for the RTC or the county in the future by not being compliant with the law.Thank you for your time and thank you for listening, if you have any questions please ask
Dave Aiazzi was not in attendance so I sent him an email with the above mentioned comments.
So lets see what happens now
Labels:
RTC
|
0
comments
Monday, September 26, 2011
Call from Dave Aiazzi
I was talking to Dave, and he informed me that NRS 244.364 is
for counties 400,000 people and over and does not apply to Washoe county
because we do not have that many people living here.
I checked the census and found that
Washoe County has 421,000, then he informed me there was a bill that modified
that to 700,000 which I did find and that bill was AB545.
After I hung up I did more research the thing that Dave
did not understand and neither did I, until I researched further is that the
population only applies to subsection 3 in NRS244.364 which has to do with
Registration of a firearm and DOES NOT apply to subsection #1.
So now to write a statement and go to the board Meeting on Sept 30, 2011.
Labels:
RTC
|
0
comments
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County
On Sep 21, 2011 I wrote an email to the Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County (RTC) and explained to them that by them not allowing people to carry guns on the bus or in there terminals they are not in compliance with state law
Here is the letter:
Here is the letter:
Greetings to the RTC Commissioners,
One of the people I know asked a simple question on the RTC Washoe website and got an answer that I don’t feel answered his question and was hoping I could get an answer from you.
His question was a 2 part question
1. I was wondering if RTC was regulated by the city/state.
2. If so I was wondering what RTC's firearm policy
The answer he got back From Robert Reeder was this:
Thank you for your inquiries regarding the RTC of Washoe County. In regard to your questions:
1) The RTC of Washoe County is regulated by numerous city, county, state and federal agencies. They include but are not limited to the City of Reno Fire Department, the Washoe County Health District, Nevada OSHA, the Federal Transit Administration and the Transportation Security Administration.
2) The RTC Board of Commissioners allows permitted concealed weapons owners to carry a concealed weapon on the system. All other weapons in plain view are prohibited on the system.
First I don’t see where some of the agencies in that list Regulate what the bus or bus system do or where he got his information from, or he was just trying to confuse the situation or just did not understand the question.
What the person was asking was, what laws do the RTC and the RTC Commission have to follow?
As we know the RTC was formed in July 1979 as a result of legislation approved by the Nevada Legislature which means the RTC and RTC commission has to follow State and local laws and set rules according to those laws
Also on the http://www.co.washoe.nv.us/citizens/boards.html page under the “Regional Transportation Commission Board” heading it states:
The commission adopts rules and regulations for the organization of the commission and the conduct of its business that are not in conflict with the Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Ordinance, chapter 373 of the Nevada Revised Statute or any other law of the State of Nevada.(emphases add by me)
This brings me to his second part of the answer that was given. Mr. Reeder states that “The RTC Board of Commissioners allows permitted concealed weapons owners to carry a concealed weapon on the system. All other weapons in plain view are prohibited on the system.”
The All other weapons in plain view are prohibited on the system is vague and tends to convey that legally carried firearms in plain sight are not allowed on the buses or in the terminals and is not in compliance with State law Due to the fact that the Nevada State Legislators in 1989 added NRS244.364(county), NRS268.418(cities and towns), and NRS269.222(unincorporated towns) and amended them in 2007 to remove any doubt what they say.
NRS 244.364 Limited authority to regulate firearms; restrictions concerning registration of certain firearms in county whose population is 400,000 or more.
1. Except as otherwise provided by specific statute, the Legislature reserves for itself such rights and powers as are necessary to regulate the transfer, sale, purchase, possession, ownership, transportation, registration and licensing of firearms and ammunition in Nevada, and no county may infringe upon those rights and powers. As used in this subsection, “firearm” means any weapon from which a projectile is discharged by means of an explosive, spring, gas, air or other force.
3. A board of county commissioners may proscribe by ordinance or regulation the unsafe discharge of firearms.I have searched both NRS and NAC and have found nothing that gives you the ability or the authority to make and set rules to stop people from carrying a legally carried firearm in plain sight either on the buses or in the terminals so please amend your rules so they comply with state law and inform your personal (Drivers and Security especially) of these changes immediately as to avoid any potential problems or Lawsuits.
Please write back to let me know what your findings are and what is being done about this issue
Labels:
RTC
|
0
comments
Response from Dave Aiazzi
Your
e-mail asks many questions that I am unsure about. If you will send me a phone
number, I will be very happy to speak to you.
Dave
Aiazzi
Labels:
RTC
|
0
comments
Thursday, September 1, 2011
Sparks City Parks
On August 20, 2010 I sent this email to the Sparks city Attorney.
On November 22, 2010 was the second reading of the bill and they voted to pass the bill
Here is the Dropbox link to the final bill signed and passed Ord2526.pdf
Here is the Reply I received from himCity AttorneyChet Adams431 Prater WaySparks, NV 89431Phone: (775) 353-2324Fax: (775) 353-1688E-mail: cadams@cityofsparks.usMr Adams
Nevada originally passed a preemption law in 1989, meaning that countiesand municipalities such as sparks cannot pass gun laws that are morerestrictive than the state law. Some gun ordinances in some parts of thestate were “grandfathered” in at that time, I don't know if that wastrue here in sparks. However, in 2007, Senate Bill 92 amended thepreemption law, removing all grandfathered ordinances with the exceptionof a handgun registration ordinance. Which only applies to Clark County
This is now known as NRS 268.418 Limited authority to regulate firearms;restrictions concerning registration of firearms in city in county whosepopulation is 400,000 or more.
1. Except as otherwise provided by specific statute, the Legislaturereserves for itself such rights and powers as are necessary to regulatethe transfer, sale, purchase, possession, ownership, transportation,registration and licensing of firearms and ammunition in Nevada, and nocity may infringe upon those rights and powers. As used in thissubsection, “firearm” means any weapon from which a projectile isdischarged by means of an explosive, spring, gas, air or other force.
There is also sections NRS 244.364 and NRS 269.222 that deal with countyand unincorporated areas and are worded similar.
Section 12.24.070 of the Sparks Municipal code states that
A. Except as provided in subsection C, it is unlawful for any person tocarry or wear a firearm in a city park.
B. A "firearm" means any weapon with a caliber of .177 inches or greaterfrom which a projectile may be propelled by means of explosive, spring,gas, air or other force.
C. Nothing in this section prohibits the carrying or wearing of afirearm by a peace officer or the carrying of a firearm pursuant to theterms of a valid concealed weapons permit.(Ord. 1383 § 1 (part), 1983.)(Ord. 2339, Amended, 09/11/2006)
This is directly in violation of State preemption laws passed in 1989and 2007, and Section 12.24.070 of the Sparks Municipal code should berepealed in its entirety to bring it back in line with State Law.
I respectfully request that you advise all such departments that theyremove this signage and instruct law enforcement that there is no lawagainst such exercise of rights.
As a law abiding citizen I wish to go about my business withoutinterference with the comfort of knowing I am able to defend myself andmy family.
I look forward to your cooperation in this matter.
Mr. John-in-Reno,On November 8, 2010 bill #2625 was introduced and had a first reading, to the Sparks City Council to repeal the section of the sparks ordnance dealing with firearms in the park.
Thank you very much for your input. I am away from my office today and have a full city council meeting on Monday.
I agree with you that this is a matter of great importance and one that deserves immediate attention. I was not aware of this potential conflict in the law and I appreciate you briniging it to my attention.
I have asked one of our attorneys to look into your concerns and report back to me with their research results. Please rest assured that I will independtly look into this as well and I will get back to you within a week with a response.
As a gun owner and a CCW permittee myself , I beleive that all of our citizens enjoy the right to self defense and protection. I can garantee you that if I believe the City's ordinances conflict with Nevada law, I will ask that the ordinances be repealed.
Thank you,
Chet Adams
Sparks City Attorney
On November 22, 2010 was the second reading of the bill and they voted to pass the bill
Here is the Dropbox link to the final bill signed and passed Ord2526.pdf
Labels:
Sparks
|
0
comments
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)